The link that I’m about to provide a visual critique on is: http://highered.mheducation.com/sites/9834092339/student_view0/chapter11/meiosis_with_crossing_over.html
I’m providing this critique based on the rules that were presented in chapter six. The website stood true to most of rule 1: the use of general design principles. The website included a paragraph of the topic, including also an animation that was narrated as well. For Rule 2: I felt that this website did well in orienting it’s users. Level one, two, and three items were all different distinct colors and sizes to show what they represented. This post obeyed Rule 3 because everything was left justified. For Rule 4, style types were limited and didn’t produce a busy screen. For Rule 5, colors were limited to headings, subheadings, and to show navigation. It obeys Rule 6 because there is a set color scheme of four colors, red, blue, orange, and black. Rule 7 was included by providing an animation for the material, which made it not boring. I believe that Rule 8 was obeyed because everything on the screen had a meaning and I didn’t see anything that seemed out of place. Rule 9 was included by never using all capital letters, making the website easier to read. Rule 10 was iffy because some text lines were much longer than others when going into explanations about the subject. Rule 11 was obeyed because single spacing was used. Rule 12 was included because the information had a “student center” which helped navigate through the entire website. Every page listed in the student center was set up exactly the same, which didn’t make you feel like you had to “hunt” for information. Rule 13 was obeyed because there was only one idea per screen. Rule 14 was used because bold letters were used to emphasize a question. Rule 15 was included because the audience was intended to be for people looking for information on this certain topic, which the website made it very clear and explanatory by being informative. Rule 16 was obeyed, there was no flashing text. Rule 17 was used because the “student center” used bullets to point out the different pages you could go to for the different topics. Rule 18 was included because the “student center” or navigation part stayed consistent on every page. Rule 19 was used because there was never any stacked text. Rule 20 was semi-used because it included an animation, but that was all. Rule 21 was obeyed because everything was grouped together according to it’s meaning and to provide clarity on the subject. Rule 22 was included because the website included different text sizes when showing the heading, subheading, and regular texts. Lastly, rule 23 was semi-used as well because as I felt that all the information was important, I was more inclined to view and felt more informed after viewing the animation with the narrator speaking along. This animation was also placed after the regular text so this rule was a bit iffy too.
I believe that visual tools can help support learners because it gives them clarity on the importance of certain things and how they relate to the subject that they’re trying to learn. For instance, if you have to brush up on a topic but don’t have enough time to read the entire thing, the different colors, different text sizes, different emphases, and different pictures, animations, or narrations can help you figure out which information is most important.

I think it’s important to use open content in the classroom. There are so many other teachers out there that, through trial and error, have found what information works best to get their students motivated in learning in the classroom. Using open content allows other teachers to adopt and adapt this information to their own classroom, which could ultimately lead to the shaping of better classrooms everywhere. I also think it’s important to use open sources because it allows anybody to use this software, regardless of budget for the most part. Educators can benefit from open sources because they can use things like blackboard to put information up for students and record their grades. I would use open content and open sources in my classroom because I believe I would highly benefit from them! As for contributing, if I find something that works and find it to be helpful to the education community, of course I would!
I’ve never made a newsletter before this week so it was a fun learning experience for me! I really enjoyed being creative and it got me excited to be able to do this in my classroom one day. There was nothing I didn’t like about this assignment! It was very fun! Next time I could improve upon the quality of content to put in a newsletter, as I was just trying to fill spaces rather than really create one for an actual classroom. All in all, I learned how to create and awesome newsletter and definitely believe this will be attributable to when I become a teacher. I’d love to create a class newsletter!

The blogs I commented on are listed below:
Post 3
and
Blog Post #3